Good idea. Don't hazard it. Decent people and civilized societies also do not let people starve merely because they the government suspects they disagree with its policies. And anyone who uses the category "enemy of the state" at this point in history, after what we have been though, is naive or wicked. Btw the famine in the Ukraine was entirely manufactured. There was no reason people had to starve that was beyond control of the government. Stalin created the famine through his collectivization policies. This isn't really disputable. jks
--- martin <mschiller at pobox.com> wrote:
> On Jan 12, 2005, at 1:38 PM, andie nachgeborenen
> wrote:
>
> > Otherwise, you're an enemy of the human race. And
> an
> > apologist for such conduct deserves no respect or
> > consideration.
>
> I just asked you what conclusion you drew from your
> observation. It
> would seem (given the cursory overview of the event
> that I've gleaned
> from your presentation) that an argument could be
> made for selective
> distribution of a finite food supply to 'friends' of
> the state rather
> than 'enemies' of the state, but I would not hazard
> that in the face of
> your conviction.
>
> Martin
>
> ___________________________________
>
http://mailman.lbo-talk.org/mailman/listinfo/lbo-talk
>
__________________________________ Do you Yahoo!? Yahoo! Mail - You care about security. So do we. http://promotions.yahoo.com/new_mail