[lbo-talk] Re: on sensible violence

[frank scott]

>
>
>Carrol, missing the point, writes:
>
>" it was obviously neither random nor senseless"
>  
>
>to the victims?  like, in some way that could have been used to protect
>themselves from the carnage?
>

well, if we can define "sensible" violence from the standpoint of 
victims, maybe we can resolve this?

like, um, hiroshima, say, where the victims clearly could, or should 
have known, as they were burning to death, that this was a "sensible" 
way to avoid invasion...etc.

fs
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <../attachments/20050711/e4a29992/attachment.htm>