These are interesting questions, and the incest taboo has been the subject of a good deal of sociobiological attention. Bestiality isa lmost certaibly a substitute for human sex of whatever your preference is. I am not sure why Kells finds these questions contemptible and ridiculous. Is there some resaon we should simply not consider whole classes of possible explantaions of human behavior, particularly those connected closely with sex and reproduction?
--- snitsnat <snitilicious at tampabay.rr.com> wrote:
> HA! since bestiality is just frequent and persistent
> enough, why aren't
> they studying the biological roots of that?
>
> that incest occurs throughout the world, and we have
> records of it
> throughout history, then why not study the
> biological origins of that? is
> the desire to fuck your mother different from the
> desire to fuck your
> sister? these are pressingly important questions,
> damn it. we must know: is
> it biologically determined or not?
>
> OK, so this guy died because his colon was
> perforated. Doesn't that mean
> that he had the stallion fuck him?
>
>
> spankthemonkily,
>
> kelley
>
>
> At 04:33 PM 7/16/2005, Autoplectic wrote:
>
><http://seattletimes.nwsource.com/html/localnews/2002384648_farm16m.html>
>
> "Finish your beer. There are sober kids in India."
>
> -- rwmartin
>
> ___________________________________
>
http://mailman.lbo-talk.org/mailman/listinfo/lbo-talk
>
__________________________________________________ Do You Yahoo!? Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around http://mail.yahoo.com