--- snitsnat <snitilicious at tampabay.rr.com> wrote:
> whoosh. right under your feet.
>
> talk to me in the third person? plonk, asshole.
>
> At 09:45 PM 7/16/2005, andie nachgeborenen wrote:
>
> >These are interesting questions, and the incest
> taboo
> >has been the subject of a good deal of
> sociobiological
> >attention. Bestiality isa lmost certaibly a
> substitute
> >for human sex of whatever your preference is. I am
> not
> >sure why Kells finds these questions contemptible
> and
> >ridiculous. Is there some resaon we should simply
> not
> >consider whole classes of possible explantaions of
> >human behavior, particularly those connected
> closely
> >with sex and reproduction?
> >
Nu, zayats, pogodi!
____________________________________________________ Start your day with Yahoo! - make it your home page http://www.yahoo.com/r/hs