[lbo-talk] Two-thirds believe London bombings are linked to Iraq war

Charles Brown cbrown at michiganlegal.org
Wed Jul 20 12:07:35 PDT 2005


Two-thirds believe London bombings are linked to Iraq war

Guardian/ICM poll Labour losing battle to convince public

Julian Glover, Political correspondent

London Guardian, Tuesday 19 July

Two-thirds of Britons believe there is a link between Tony

Blair's decision to invade Iraq and the London bombings despite

government claims to the contrary, according to a Guardian/ICM

poll published today.

The poll makes it clear that voters believe further attacks in

Britain by suicide bombers are also inevitable, with 75% of those

responding saying there will be more attacks.

The research suggests the government is losing the battle to

persuade people that terrorist attacks on the UK have not been

made more likely by the invasion of Iraq.

According to the poll, 33% of Britons think the prime minister

bears "a lot" of responsibility for the London bombings and a

further 31% "a little".

Only 28% of voters agree with the government that Iraq and the

London bombings are not connected.

The poll follows repeated efforts by the government to stress

that al-Qaida attacks, including September 11, took place before,

as well as after, the invasion of Iraq.

Yesterday a government spokesman said the prime minister had told

the cabinet that people who used Iraq to justify the London

bombings had "a perverse view of Islam".

The foreign secretary, Jack Straw, dismissed a think-tank report

which argued that there was a link between the invasion of Iraq

and the bombings.

The report by Chatham House, formerly the Royal Institute of

International Affairs, said: "There is no doubt that the

situation over Iraq has imposed particular difficulties for the

UK, and for the wider coalition against terrorism."

Mr Straw said in Brussels yesterday: "I'm astonished Chatham

House is now saying that we should not have stood shoulder to

shoulder with our long-standing allies."

"The terrorists have struck across the world, in countries allied

with the US backing the war in Iraq, and in countries which had

nothing whatever to do with the war in Iraq."

But the Guardian/ICM poll shows the public believe that Britain's

frontline role has made the country a more obvious target. It

also shows that while Britons have reacted relatively calmly to

the attacks earlier this month - with 83% saying they were no

less likely to travel into central London and 75% saying they

were just as likely to use the tube - the public does want the

government to respond with new legislation.

A clear majority - 71% - want the government to exclude or deport

from the UK foreign Muslims who incite hatred, with only 22%

believing such people should be allowed to live in the UK.

That may give some comfort to ministers as they seek to persuade

opposition parties to support new laws making it an offence to

incite terrorism.

But the poll also shows that despite the attacks, there is

increasingly limited public support for ID cards.

Only 53% of those questioned said they believed ID cards should

be brought in to help in the fight against terrorism - a fall on

previous findings before and after the bombings.

Reflecting the relative cross-party unity that has dominated

politics since the attacks, the poll also finds that Labour's

poll lead remains almost unchanged on last month's Guardian/ICM

findings.

Despite public unease about the prime minister's decision to

support the invasion of Iraq, Labour has the support of 39% of

voters (up one point on last month), the Conservatives 31% (no

change) and the Liberal Democrats 23% (no change).

. ICM interviewed a random sample of 1,005 adults aged 18+ by

telephone between July 15 and 17. Interviews were conducted

across the country and the results have been weighted to the

profile of all adults. ICM is a member of the British Polling

Council and abides by its rules.

-------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <../attachments/20050720/93991c20/attachment.htm>



More information about the lbo-talk mailing list