> Uhlas: "Don't China's exports to the developed world make substantial contribution to economic growth?"
> It certainly does, but those exports also make a substantial >contribution to indigenous development (which was not always the >case when the 'comprador' capitalist class subordinated Chinese >development to foreign investment in the early 20C.).>>
I never said anything about 'comprador' capitalist class. 'Comprador' is a meaningless category. Which capital doesn't make substantial contribution to indigenous development?
Ulhas