Griffin seems different from the rest. He seems like a well meaning person who claims no expertise. He has just collated information from different sources, while others seem to have deep insight into hidden forces.
On Sun, Jul 31, 2005 at 05:25:18PM -0400, Doug Henwood wrote:
> This is a beaut - an exchange between 9/11 conspiracist David Ray
> Griffin and Amy Goodman (with Chip Berlet also on the line):
>
> <http://www.democracynow.org/article.pl?sid=04/05/26/150221>
>
> [...]
>
> AMY GOODMAN: Can you name an expert you have relied on, for example
> on the issue of the world trade center towers going down, expert in
> structural engineering who has said it is impossible for the
> explanation to be the planes hit, and the fires caused the towers to
> go down?
>
> DAVID RAY GRIFFIN: Well, again, I say I have got 40 pages of notes.
> I've got a lot of notes on that chapter, and so readers can go and
> see the --
>
> AMY GOODMAN: Name just one. Name just one structural engineering
> expert who said it is not feasible that the planes caused the towers
> to go down.
>
> DAVID RAY GRIFFIN: I'm sorry, I don't have that information at my
> fingertips right at this moment.
>
> [...]
>
> Wow, what a genre this is!
>
> Doug
> ___________________________________
> http://mailman.lbo-talk.org/mailman/listinfo/lbo-talk
-- Michael Perelman Economics Department California State University Chico, CA 95929
Tel. 530-898-5321 E-Mail michael at ecst.csuchico.edu