whether he is an engineer or an economist is irrellevant to the main point.
the significant point is that he is former Bush administration official who is taking a position that he thinks that 9-11 is an inside-job.
That is 'politically' significant, not significant in terms of what his training is.
Joe W.
>From: Doug Henwood <dhenwood at panix.com>
>Reply-To: lbo-talk at lbo-talk.org
>To: lbo-talk at lbo-talk.org
>Subject: Re: [lbo-talk] 'bogus' WTC Collapse story
>Date: Tue, 14 Jun 2005 19:55:50 -0400
>
>Joseph Wanzala wrote:
>
>>Do you have anything more 'concrete' if you'll excuse the expression...?
>
>I don't see why a retired economist is the go-to guy on structural
>engineering. I've noticed that retired engineers often have funny ideas
>about economics, so...
>
>Doug
>___________________________________
>http://mailman.lbo-talk.org/mailman/listinfo/lbo-talk
_________________________________________________________________ On the road to retirement? Check out MSN Life Events for advice on how to get there! http://lifeevents.msn.com/category.aspx?cid=Retirement