[lbo-talk] Can Liberal Faiths Compete with Conservative Faiths? (An Appeal to Ignorance)

snitsnat snitilicious at tampabay.rr.com
Thu Jun 16 13:44:59 PDT 2005


lbo=evil; hoover=good. gotcha. jeez hooever, why are you on the list. i really like your posts, but if you so dislike everyone here but joanna, then why are you on the list?

At 04:09 PM 6/16/2005, Michael Hoover wrote:
> >>> dhenwood at panix.com 06/16/05 12:16 PM >>>
>Michael Hoover wrote:
> >never sure on lbo whether poster questions are asked sincerely given
> >pervasive 'new smarty' list culture (comment not intentionally
> >directed to above lister) but...
>
>Hmm, maybe we should try out a "new dummy" culture. Works nicely for
>some other forums.
>Doug
><<<<<>>>>>
>
>either/or, tit for tat, if not this then that, surely one can move beyond
>such crude 'dialectical' thinking, oh wait, above is irony,
>birthright of certain contemporary cosmopolitans, protection of sort - no
>matter how leaky condom is (as mark dery suggests) - against vast
>wasteland that sucks everyone else in...
>
>re. dery, his point about fundamentalist christanity and conspiracy theory
>sharing accceptance on faith that social issues can be reduced to
>manichean struggle between good and evil is interesting given two topics
>dominating lbo-er attention in recent days... michael hoover
>
>--------------------------------------------------------------
>Please Note:
>Due to Florida's very broad public records law, most written
>communications to or from College employees regarding College business are
>public records, available to the public and media upon request. Therefore,
>this e-mail communication may be subject to public disclosure.
>
>___________________________________
>http://mailman.lbo-talk.org/mailman/listinfo/lbo-talk

"Finish your beer. There are sober kids in India."

-- rwmartin



More information about the lbo-talk mailing list