Well Doug, in all honesty I can say that from everything I have seen and read, profit taking is 'a' , if not 'the', primary engine of imperialism. Repeatedly, throughout history, gold, spices, silk, and now oil are very strong motivating factors. By contrast, countries that have become "more trouble than they're *worth*" have been shed from the imperium.
Afghanistan was attacked and the Taliban toppled. A "friendly" (Karzai) was put in in place. But for whatever reason, Bush went after Iraq. This has resulted in the quagmire that we now see, the result of which is that Bush would be extremely hard-pressed to build up troop levels in Afghanistan towards any number that could dominate the country, if that's even possible *at all*, Iraq-conflict or not.
In any case, there seems to be an assumption that I meant that oil was *the only* reason for the attack on Afghanistan. No, I did not mean that nor do I think it. However, I do believe that for some in the administration, and for many lobbiests and presidential advisers, oil is their prime motivating factor. It is most certainly, to my mind at least, one of the primary considerations that went into the attack. --
Gary Williams
"Over himself, over his own body and mind, the individual is sovereign." - John Stuart Mill
Todays Iraq Body Count
Min Max
22582 25590