[lbo-talk] Re: Million Dollar Baby gets disability dead wrong

Michael Pugliese michael098762001 at earthlink.net
Fri Mar 4 15:08:01 PST 2005


Michael Medved, the obnoxious, has a new autobio. out. Flipping through it I see he was the campaign mgr. for Ron Dellums in '72. Insinuates he was hired to be Jewish token. Like Horowitz on Robert Scheer in, "Radical Son, " (claims a drunk or stoned Scheer in '70 rambled for an hr. on KPFA on the glories of North Korean Juche) Medved claims Scheer baited fellow Jewish leftists to support PFLP. http://www.opinionjournal.com/la/?id=110006305

My 'Million Dollar' Answer Why would a conservative criticize Clint Eastwood's latest work? I'll tell you. BY MICHAEL MEDVED Thursday, February 17, 2005 12:01 a.m. EST

http://www.nationalreview.com/thecorner/05_02_20_corner-archive.asp#056905 MILLION DOLLAR BABY [Mike Potemra] I finally saw it. To the extent that it rises above (or sinks below) the level of a formulaic boxing movie, it is a film that combines right-wing Nietzscheanism with left-wing Nietzscheanism in a strong brew of despair and dehumanization. Enough has probably been said about the films depiction, in its final scenes, of bioethical issues. What does need pointing out, I think, is the extent to which the final scenes are not tacked on, but rather are a natural outgrowth of the rest of this pernicious film. The movie from the very beginning uses boxing as a metaphor for life: The people who have dignity are the fighters. This is an easy metaphor to get away with, because--in its fallen condition--mankind does indeed tend to lose sight of its true source of dignity, and seek its redemption on an individual basis: being better, stronger, tougher, faster, smarter, wittier, more famous, etc., than the next person. But acquiescing in this metaphor of struggle can carry a prohibitive moral cost, which is abundantly on display in this ugly film. The movies chief villains are the woman boxers female relatives: They are depicted as without any redeeming virtue, a bunch of thugs and welfare cheats who live off others without any gratitude. The film does not use the old Nazi phrase "useless eaters" to describe them, but the idea comes through loud and clear. No wonder, then, that when the heroine remember, she is tough, famous, pretty, and noble; in short, someone who deserves to be alive faces the possibility of life as just such a, "useless eater," she, like the film, chooses death. This is a dull movie, punctuated by a handful of emotionally effective moments, and carries a degrading message. It is a not an analysis of what sin has done to humanity; it is a symptom. Posted at 06:37 PM

http://www.weeklystandard.com/Content/Public/Articles/000/000/005/307qsmui.asp by Wesley J. Smith 03/01/2005 11:00:00 AM IF ACADEMY AWARDS were given for the greatest lost opportunity, Million Dollar Baby would have won them, too.

-- Michael Pugliese



More information about the lbo-talk mailing list