That they are witless at winning elections in order to do so?
>> Two-thirds of Dems in the House voted against authortization for the war. As I said in an earlier post, the obvious antiwar strategy is therefore to expand the number of antiwar Dems.>>
Which brings me back to the overall witlessness of the last presidential campaign. You can quote the part about how stupid it is to run a campaign politically right of your own party and avoid the one killer linkage issue offered to you (the WAR, John Kerry, you privileged dumbass!).
>But maybe that's too obvious a strategy for you,
> and you think walking aimlessly in the street and yelling will somehow
> intimidate Bush into changing policy?>>
Perhaps you didn't notice I already said it was about as big a waste of time as canvassing for the halfwit Kerry?
> >Note really, Antonio Villlaraigosa, a former union organizer, is poised to become mayor of Los Angeles, the second largest city in the country.>>
And how many millions of dollars is it going to take to do that?
> Barak Obama came from quite modest means to become Senator of Illinois.
A real up and coming Dem half-wit, this guy.
> Yes, it was. And two-thirds of Dems in the House opposed that war. But
> you keep ranting, and ranting, and ignoring basic facts.
And the Dems keep ignoring basic issues when they run for the presidency. Halfwits. You think Dr. Dean is going to save you now? By 2008, no doubt, he'll be running on an anti-terror ticket!
Fugazy
-- _______________________________________________ NEW! Lycos Dating Search. The only place to search multiple dating sites at once. http://datingsearch.lycos.com