[lbo-talk] Shaivo finale on my part (for real)

snitsnat snitilicious at tampabay.rr.com
Thu Mar 24 11:00:26 PST 2005


At 01:30 PM 3/24/2005, C. G. Estabrook wrote:
>It seems to me that Marta is right on this matter. What I don't quite
>understand is the connection to abortion. Many people opposed to abortion
>seem to agree with the "disabled activists who are fighting to save
>Terri's life," while many pro-"choice" people seem complacent with the
>notion of her starving to death. The latter group seem like the Clinton
>whom Alex Cockburn described a dozen years ago: "He's no friend of the
>unborn and unwanted, and that's enough to keep the liberals happy." --CGE

Is that what is happening, or are people trying to feed her as a human should be fed, as in that article I forwarded. Are loving hands who want her to live spooning tasty sustenance into her mouth, working with her body to make sure she swallows, talking to her, etc? If she "starves to death" it's because her body no longer works without a machine.

Kelley



More information about the lbo-talk mailing list