On Thu, 24 Mar 2005, snitsnat wrote:
> At 01:30 PM 3/24/2005, C. G. Estabrook wrote:
> >It seems to me that Marta is right on this matter. What I don't quite
> >understand is the connection to abortion. Many people opposed to abortion
> >seem to agree with the "disabled activists who are fighting to save
> >Terri's life," while many pro-"choice" people seem complacent with the
> >notion of her starving to death. The latter group seem like the Clinton
> >whom Alex Cockburn described a dozen years ago: "He's no friend of the
> >unborn and unwanted, and that's enough to keep the liberals happy." --CGE
>
> Is that what is happening, or are people trying to feed her as a human
> should be fed, as in that article I forwarded. Are loving hands who want
> her to live spooning tasty sustenance into her mouth, working with her body
> to make sure she swallows, talking to her, etc? If she "starves to death"
> it's because her body no longer works without a machine.
>
>
> Kelley
>