>The situation was/is ugly, not the remark, which as the impeachment showed
>was nothing more than the simple truth. And I'd say that Counterpunch and
>Cockburn are pretty good on unfashionable victims -- e.g., his recent
>references there to Wypijewski's reporting on the Shanley case. --CGE
>
>
>On Thu, 24 Mar 2005, Doug Henwood wrote:
>
>> I guess I was feeling more forgiving towards him in 1993, because
>> that's a really ugly remark.
>>
>> By the way, what the fuck has Cockburn ever done for the "unwanted"?
>>
>> Doug
>>
>> C. G. Estabrook wrote:
>>
>> >His "Beat the Devil" column in The Nation for 05/03/1993:
>> ><www.nationarchive.com/Summaries/v256i0017_07.htm>. --CGE
>> >
>> >
>> >On Thu, 24 Mar 2005, Doug Henwood wrote:
>> >
>> >> C. G. Estabrook wrote:
>> >>
>> >> >The latter group seem like the Clinton whom Alex Cockburn
>> >> >described a dozen years ago: "He's no friend of the unborn
>> >> >and unwanted, and that's enough to keep the liberals happy."
>> >>
>> >> Did Cockburn really say that? Where?
> > >>
>
>___________________________________
>http://mailman.lbo-talk.org/mailman/listinfo/lbo-talk
-- Marta Russell Los Angeles, CA http://www.martarussell.com/