>Those interested in the "constitutional ins and outs" might want to read
>the brief submitted by Michael Schiavo's attorneys and the ACLU in
>opposition to the Schindlers' lawsuit, which (especially at pp. 34-46)
>summarizes their arguments why Pub. Law. 109-3 (the statute "For the
>relief of the parents of Theresa Marie Schiavo" passed last week under
>color of which the federal litigation has been conducted) is unconstitutional.
>
>Among the on line sources for this purpose is:
>
> http://news.findlaw.com/legalnews/lit/schiavo/index.html
Which document do yu want us to read? There are at least 40 links in that center column alone. Do we get, like, a clue or do we have to discern it. I searched on the most likely candidates in your para -- ACLU, public Law, Pub., and brief -- no joy.
kelley