The issue is challenging dualistic apocalyptic millennialism as the basis for Christian Right dominionism.
Whole page explaining how it works:
http://www.publiceye.org/christian_right/cr_intro.html
But it is not likely that unless you are conversant in the terms of the debate that any "religious person" will listen.
Chip
> -----Original Message-----
> From: lbo-talk-bounces at lbo-talk.org
> [mailto:lbo-talk-bounces at lbo-talk.org] On Behalf Of martin
> Sent: Tuesday, May 10, 2005 10:59 AM
> To: lbo-talk at lbo-talk.org
> Subject: Re: [lbo-talk] dadaism and fish
>
>
> On May 10, 2005, at 7:34 AM, Chip Berlet wrote:
>
> > Arguing with a secularist about religion is like arguing with a fish
> > about dadaism.
> >
> >
>
> I didn't think that the question was about 'arguing religion'. The
> question that I posed was about your knowledge of a division
> within the
> 'fundamentalist' camp of the christian 'faith' that might or
> might not
> be exploitable.
>
> Dividing politically active opposition might be a goal for organizing
> efforts.
>
> Martin
>
> ___________________________________
> http://mailman.lbo-talk.org/mailman/listinfo/lbo-talk
>