> My first reaction on reading this was that the reason anarchism has
> received so little academic attention is that few people remain
> anarchists after their 30th birthday. But I dismissed the thought as
> too cruel & glib.
>
> Doug
>
>
Maybe a slightly less glib and cruel way of putting it is that whatever anarchist theoretical tradition may exist is (how shall I put it?) a little on the thin side. (No disrespect to Graeber or indifference to his fate at Yale is implied.)
-------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <../attachments/20050511/bbc51dcf/attachment.htm>