DH writes:
> The publication is not left. It's not Red Dawn or Workers Vanguard,
> or even The Nation. It has a lot of left-leaning people who write and
> edit it.
No shit, really? Like give me a name or two, I might know them. And I can tell you how left they are (not having to go even as far as CP let alone the stuff you cite). Or are you talking about the rad reds who make the tea and sweep the floor or something?
>They are not fond of many aspects of US culture. That
> attitude fits with upperish-class British disdain for American
> culture. There are many such people who write and edit the FT. Both
> influences show.
I don't see the connection. You can find that disdain at lots of British publications. Most of it is simply utter awe combined with near total ignorance of the empire that took over control of the world from them.
>
> > Wish someone would with moderation duties would tell Mikie P to
> > put teabags on his eyes and massage his nipples or something.
>
> You just told him. I'm the moderator, and I've made it clear what I
> think of Michael Pug's latest eruptions.
He sends stuff offlist that indicates that sooner or later he will stop giggling when he googles.
F
-- _______________________________________________ NEW! Lycos Dating Search. The only place to search multiple dating sites at once. http://datingsearch.lycos.com