[lbo-talk] New Sex drugs

Miles Jackson cqmv at pdx.edu
Sat May 28 08:54:36 PDT 2005


On Sun, 29 May 2005, Bill Bartlett wrote:


> Hardy doesn't seem to have the slightest grasp of how evolution works. The
> "Darwinian logic behind the female orgasm" is hardly "elusive", it seems
> fairly obvious to me that it might support the bond between parents over the
> extended period necessary for humans to rear their children. The "Darwinian
> logic" is that children being supported by two parents generally have an
> advantage over children supported only by one parent and sex seems to help to
> keep mother and father on the team. I would have thought it unnecessary to
> spell out that an ongoing sex life is more likely if both parents are
> enjoying it.

Cue Justin; more "just so" stories! I can't resist engaging in speculation, though: Bill's argument doesn't even seem to work as a "just so" adaptation story. If a woman can have an orgasm with any sexual partner, male, female or herself (remember that intercourse is definitely not necessary!), why on earth would she be compelled to form a pair bond with just one man? You could just as plausibly argue that orgasm would encourage a variety of sexual relationships (but of course, that doesn't fit the "women are monogamous" stereotype, so we don't tend to make up "just so" stories about women's natural promiscuity).

Miles



More information about the lbo-talk mailing list