> Marvin Gandall typed, in another related thread:
>
> Re: [lbo-talk] Resisting occupation
> <...>
> Charles is right: the US was clearly the aggressor in Iraq, but I reject
> justifying the right of resistance to foreign occupation on this basis
> alone, or even primarily.
> <...>
>
> Now that I'm done laughing at Mr. Gandalls position on
> what the Iraqis should think about a foreign occupation...
>
>
> The correct position is, and *ALWAY WAS* Out Now.
>
> Anyone who, at any time, thought differently, IS part of
> the problem, even if they've renounced their previous
> support for the invasion. Sorry your nasty little war is
> going badly for you...
---------------------------------
I haven't the slightest idea what this screwball is referring to...
I've never held any position other than the immediate withdrawal of US troops.
Some people can't read - or understand what they read.
MG