If you disagree, please elaborate. I look forward to it, because it's an endlessly fascinating question, isn't it? We also try to elide the problem with these pansy-ass solutions and simpering little constructions where we claim there's no primacy to class analysis -- just to, on my view, placate the little bitches -- but there's really no seriousness in it. in the end, it's class all the way down and everything else exists on top of it like some false store front that tries to get your attention while still serving up the ugly frame house underneath.
but you're not like that, so I'd like to hear what you have to say.
>Even with the destruction of male supremacy , there will still be sexes.
really? wow! I didn't know that. Why do you suppose it is that whenever you say such a thing to even leftist men who should know better, all they can imagine is i want to cut off their cocks and duct tape my rack into androgyny.
That, Charles my man, is a problem. Especially when
1. You've read me for about 7 years now. 2. I dropped numerous klews in the two sentences you quote above.
>Nothing wrong with appealing to altruism, but in this society probably have
>to appeal to self-interest too, if you want to succeed.
do you appeal to capitalists' self interest? what happens when reform movements appeal to those self-interests?
Shit happens. That's what happens
As I mentioned, I was inspired by http://thagmano.blogspot.com, specifically,http://thagmano.blogspot.com/2005/11/why-why-why-dont-we-get-it.html and http://thagmano.blogspot.com/2005/11/ok-now-youre-pissing-me-off.html
Now, bitch has some pixel pushin' to do
"You know how it is -- come for the animal porn, stay for the cultural analysis."
Bitch | Lab http://blog.pulpculture.org