Norman G. Finkelstein has demonstrated that the Holocaust Industry -- which is NOT a den of neo-Nazis -- has inflated the number of Holocaust survivors in order to extort money from Swiss banks and the like, so much so that, if we were to accept the figures blandished by the Holocaust Industry, we would be engaging in a Holocaust denial.
<blockquote> In my last chapter I explore the material compensation issue. I contend that the Holocaust industry is guilty of a "double shakedown": it misappropriates monies from European governments as well as from the actual survivors of Nazi persecution. Even the official history of the Jewish Claims Conference acknowledges that the Conference made improper use of the monies originally earmarked by the German government for Holocaust victims. During the recent slave-labor negotiations, the Claims Conference put forth wildly inflated figures for still living former Jewish slave-laborers. In doing so, the Conference forces a radical revision of our understanding of the Nazi holocaust: increasing the number of survivors means decreasing the number of victims. Indeed, the numbers used by the Claims Conference place it uncomfortably close to the arguments of Holocaust revisionists. "If everyone who claims to be a survivor actually is one," my mother (a concentration camp survivor) used to exclaim, "who did Hitler kill?"
(Norman G. Finkelstein, "Will _The Holocaust Industry_ Incite Anti- Semitism?" Sueddeutsche Zeitung, <http://www.normanfinkelstein.com/ article.php?pg=3&ar=36>, August 11, 2000)</blockquote>
That surely is the most successful Holocaust denial ever, since the revisionists have not only gotten away with it politically but made a killing on the denial.
Yoshie Furuhashi <http://montages.blogspot.com> <http://monthlyreview.org> <http://mrzine.org>