>Or that the poster above (and the others who have contributed to the
>parallel thread here characterized as Bennett's supposed "Racism")
>disagree with what, quite obviously, was Bennett's actual statement
>-- namely, that that ignoring nuance and complexity and instead
>extracting as a "sole purpose" an aim (here: such as "reduc[ing]
>crime") risks reaching "ridiculous" and "represhensible" conclusions
>(such as recommending that "you could abort every black baby in this
>country")?
Wow indeed. What's your fucking point? That Bennett's remark was some exercise in Swiftian irony?
Doug