> At 06:01 AM 10/25/2005, Victor wrote to Joanna:
>>I see that you only read beyond the lines.
>>
>>Had you read the lines you would recognize that my commentary on the
>>development of political economic systems is
>
>
> http://www.amazon.com/exec/obidos/tg/detail/-/0971732000/qid=1130248320/sr=1-2/ref=sr_1_2/102-3994204-3064109?v=glance&s=books
>
>
>>based on a far broader collection of historical literature on the subject
>>than the standard Marxist analyses, is a proposal for wide theoretical
>>changes to the whole concept of the development of new modes of production
>>and the consequent conflicts, for example and a much less restricted use
>>of dialectical materialist method for analysing historical developments in
>>general.
>
>
> http://www.amazon.com/exec/obidos/07_True_Believer_Thumpthumpthump_OoogaBooga_WallaWalla_BingBang_BoopBoop_be_do_boop_/=glance&s=books
>
>
>
>>Had you read the lines you would have discovered that the final appeal of
>>the article was not for restriction of book learning, but of book worship,
>>i.e. the argument from authority and orthodoxy rather than from theory
>>tested by evidence collected from historical practice.
>
> http://www.amazon.com/exec/obidos/ASIN/007141858X/ref=pd_sxp_elt_l1/102-3994204-3064109
>
>
>>Had you read the lines you should have realized that the use of the
>>disturbing term "inimitable" as regards Mao's works was IRONIC.
>
> http://www.amazon.com/exec/obidos/tg/detail/-/0415054532/qid=1130248255/sr=1-6/ref=sr_1_6/102-3994204-3064109?v=glance&s=books
>
>
>>You protest being patronized while demonstrating
>>1. That your knowledge of theory is inadequate for an argument on the
>>issues
>>2. That the same could be said of you acquaintance with the historical
>>material
>>3. That your reading skills are seriously compromised by a fertile and
>>fantastic imagination.
>
> http://www.amazon.com/exec/obidos/ASIN/0684868016/ref=pd_sxp_elt_l1/102-3994204-3064109
> ___________________________________
> http://mailman.lbo-talk.org/mailman/listinfo/lbo-talk
>