[lbo-talk] Counterpunch plagiarizes the Washington Monthly's K. Drum

[C. G. Estabrook]

A (corrected) misattribution no more constitutes "repeatedly
publishing plagiarized material" than observations which which
you disagree are "demonstrable fabrications."  But I thought
in fact your objection was the much more incisive "they are a
bullshit outlet"?  

---- Original message ----
>Date: Sun, 4 Sep 2005 07:11:11 -0700 (PDT)
>From: Chris Doss <lookoverhere1 at yahoo.com>  
>Subject: RE: [lbo-talk] Counterpunch plagiarizes the
Washington Monthly's K. Drum  
>To: lbo-talk at lbo-talk.org
>
>
>I don't think it calls for much analysis when a
>website publishes demonstrable fabrications and
>plagiarized material repeatedly.
>
>--- "C. G. Estabrook" <galliher at uiuc.edu> wrote:
>
>> How can one possibly contest such an insightful
>> analysis?
>>   --CGE
>>
>
>
>Nu, zayats, pogodi!
>
>
>		
>____________________________________________________
>Start your day with Yahoo! - make it your home page 
>http://www.yahoo.com/r/hs 
> 
>___________________________________
>http://mailman.lbo-talk.org/mailman/listinfo/lbo-talk