You two! I'm going to start nicknaming you after the cat and dog. :)
So, the other day, I thought I read about some plan to have people chatting after class, doing alternative teach-ins. I guess I'd be really bugged to find out people had planned such a thing. It feels manipulative. Why can't you just have the teach-in, instead of pretending to have spontanous discussions in the hallway. Does anyone else find this a less than tactful approach and, quite possibly, one that would backfire once it was exposed as a big plan?
Now I'm thinking back on every time I saw the red-orange wankers screaming outside the Hall of Languages. It was all staged, to get people to listen to the guy -- I kid you not -- in a black turtle neck, black slacks, and black beret -- and a serious case of unmatched blacks.
k
"I got food and water for a year and I ain't run outta weed yet"
--NOLA holdout, quoted in NYT (look it up. I"m too lazy to find the citation at the mo')
(don't mine' granny. she been studying Fla R Civ P all day)