Doug Henwood wrote:
>
> Thomas Seay wrote:
>
>
>
> No it's not the whole explanation by any means. But if you built a
> multivariable model to explain the decline of Hitchens, booze would
> have a very respectable t-statistic.
The point I understood Thomas to be making (and it was the point of my last post) is why do you _want_ to explain the decline of Hitchens. As Thomas and I both suggested, perhaps personal acquaintances might be interested in that, but it is merely a personal matter, having no political relevance.
Carrol
>
> Doug
> ___________________________________
> http://mailman.lbo-talk.org/mailman/listinfo/lbo-talk