[lbo-talk] Hitchens Reviews "Darkness At Noon"

[joanna]

I'll join Carrol and Thomas here. Hitch's drinking interests me as much 
as Bush's bladder or K's nose picking: not at all. And the small talk 
that revolves around this shit reminds me of chatter in the servants' 
quarters.

Joanna

Carrol Cox wrote:


>Doug Henwood wrote:
>  
>
>>Thomas Seay wrote:
>>
>>
>>
>>No it's not the whole explanation by any means. But if you built a
>>multivariable model to explain the decline of Hitchens, booze would
>>have a very respectable t-statistic.
>>    
>>
>
>The point I understood Thomas to be making (and it was the point of my
>last post) is why do you _want_ to explain the decline of Hitchens. As
>Thomas and I both suggested, perhaps personal acquaintances might be
>interested in that, but it is merely a personal matter, having no
>political relevance.
>
>Carrol
>
>
>  
>
>>Doug
>>___________________________________
>>http://mailman.lbo-talk.org/mailman/listinfo/lbo-talk
>>    
>>
>___________________________________
>http://mailman.lbo-talk.org/mailman/listinfo/lbo-talk
>
>  
>

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <../attachments/20050916/4a262ad2/attachment.htm>