More of a question than a critique.
I agree with you, but I feel the need to ask anyway...
A great majority of greenhouse gas emissions come from only a handful of countries (EU States, US, Canada, Japan, NZ, Australia). I would suppose that even if only the US and EU were on board for significant cuts in GHG emissions, this would have a large impact. The relevant technology doesn't need to be put into place on a global scale. It would have a significant impact on the emissions if is was only implemented in the OECD90 (as the chart below shows).
http://www.pewclimate.org/global-warming-basics/facts_and_figures/regdist.cfm
I know the problem with this assumption (besides the fact that even getting the US and EU on board is a pipe dream)...which is that the production of GHG emitting industrial processes would just be transferred to places where there aren't the restrictions.
Bryan
Carrol Cox wrote:
> Is it possible under
> capitalism to achieve the degree of uniformity worldwide that will allow
> the relevant technology to be put to use on a global scale? I assume it
> is not. Global warming is a "disaster waiting to happen" which _will_
> happen under capitalism.
>
> Carrol
>