>I'm sorry. UFPJ chooses to join hands with ANSWER and I don't blame any sane
>officeholder from not wanting to have snapshots of linking hands with folks
>who think North Korea is just a peachy keen government.
>
>The idiocy of prioritizing unity with ANSWER over other folks is why,
>despite massive disdain for the war, the "antiwar movement" has remained so
>marginal. It was depressing two years ago and it's depressing now.
I love liberal sectarianism. Is this the political equivalent of the one-drop-of-blood standard?
And, more broadly, why are the Dems such pussies on the war? Withdrawal is becoming a majority position now, and they're still afraid of saying anything?
Doug