[lbo-talk] IAEA Vote on Iran

YOSHIE FURUHASHI furuhashi.1 at osu.edu
Sun Sep 25 08:30:30 PDT 2005


Washington didn't get everything it wanted, but still it's unhappy news:

<blockquote>India votes to refer Iran to UNSC

September 25, 2005 13:03 IST

The International Atomic Energy Agency's board today approved a resolution that sets up Iran for future referral to the United Nations Security Council. India has voted in favour of the resolution.

Diplomats inside the meeting said, however, that only 22 of the 35 board nations voted for the United States-backed European Union motion, reflecting the divisions over the referral.

Only twice in the past two decades has the IAEA board voted on an issue instead of adopting a resolution by consensus. Both of those were on sending North Korea to the council -- in 1993 and 2003 -- for breaking with the nonproliferation treaty.

Board nations Russia and China, which are also veto-wielding Security Council members, abstained, along with 10 other nations, all of them developing countries. Among those voting for the resolution were European countries on the board, along with the United States, Canada, Australia, Peru, Singapore and Japan.

Venezuela cast the only vote against. . . .

<http://in.rediff.com/news/2005/sep/25iran.htm></blockquote>

<blockquote> CPI(M) criticises India's vote on Iran

September 25, 2005 18:26 IST

The Communist Party of India (Marxist) has called the resolution adopted by the International Atomic Energy Agency on the Iran nuclear issue is 'unjustifiable and one-sided'.

"It is shameful that India has voted with the United States and the western countries to refer Iran to the UN Security Council unless it complies with the demands made," it said in a press release.

The CPI(M) has said that the Congress-led United Progressive Alliance government has caved in to United States' pressure and gone back on its stated stand.

"Till the eve of the vote in the IAEA, the Indian government had maintained that the Iran issue should be dealt with within the framework of the IAEA and that decisions have to be taken by consensus. India had also recognised the right of Iran to develop its nuclear technology under international safeguards as a signatory of the Nuclear Non-Proliferation Treaty," the release said, adding that India's vote has now 'reversed all these positions'.

"India has broken ranks with the non-aligned countries which had decided not to support the US stand on Iran. India voting for the resolution along with the US and the European Union-3 has violated its own stand that decisions should be taken by consensus in the IAEA board," the CPI(M) says. . . .

<http://in.rediff.com/news/2005/sep/25cpi.htm></blockquote>

Yoshie



More information about the lbo-talk mailing list