info at pulpculture.org wrote:
>
>
>
> Carrol's explanation is that you denounce Lyndie b/c she's an agent of the
> occupation, but you don't denounce the car bombers because they are
> resisting US occupation? (I think it's a little more complicated than that.)
I guess my post was not clear on its own provenance.
I wasn't really responding to your main question. I haven't said (and am not going to say) anything about England, though I objected to the tone and officiousness of some of the attacks on her. My post dealt with the question of car bombers as an independent issue, not connected to England.
Carrol