>Um, Doug is it a tendentious paraphrase that Carroll said, that critics of
>ANSWER were limited: "One consists of the enemies of any mass movement:
>Nathan, Chuck0, Wojtek, Pugliese."
Hey, I rebuked him for that!
>And in another post Doug said this about the whole ANSWER issue:
>-No one except you, David Corn, Marc Cooper, and Nathan Newman really
>-finds this a scandal. Carrol Cox's liberal comrades in Illinois don't
>-care. Philip Weiss, writing in this week's New York magazine, doesn't
>-care. This is sectarianism disguised as anti-sectarianism. The cold
>-war is long over. Give it up.
>
>Again, this is a pseudo populist line. There have been raging debates
>involving hundreds of posters on this exact issue all over Daily Kos and
>other groups.
I'm not sure I'm impressed. How many divisions have these hundreds of posters?
Doug