--- Daniel Davies <d_squared_2002 at yahoo.co.uk> wrote:
\>
> I hope that Charles B is noting that the tables have
> been turned here with
> regard to the usual treatment of conspiracy
> theories. We are the rational ones
> this time, making the simple assumption that this
> was a case of state murder.
>
What is rational in assuming that a state would damage itself, which is all that the L. murder has done to Russia?
Let me get this straight: when a man who is employed by THE RUSSIAN MAFIA DON Berezovsky, A MAN IMPLICATED IN SEVERAL MURDERS, is poisoned by a method that TAKES DAYS TO KILL and gives LOTS OF MEDIA PUBLICITY, CREATES A PUBLIC HEALTH SCARE and LEAVES BIG OBVIOUS TRAILS, and HAS SPENT YEARS IN A PR CAMPAIGN TO DAMAGE THE RUSSIAN STATE, why then it must be the Russian state that did it. That is simplest, supposedly. Why, he must have had some incredible material proving his thesis that the FSB caused 9/11. This was so urgent to take care of that the Russian state timed killing him for A MEETING BETWEEN THE RUSSIAN PROSECUTOR'S OFFICE AND THE BRITISH AUTHORITIES TO EXTRADITE BEREZOVSKY and PUTIN'S EU MEETING IN HELSINKI, thereby causing immense damage to the reputation of the Russian state.
Can anybody really be this gullible?
____________________________________________________________________________________ Do you Yahoo!? Everyone is raving about the all-new Yahoo! Mail beta. http://new.mail.yahoo.com