On Dec 3, 2006, at 9:52 PM, Carrol Cox wrote:
> It's odd how large a number of response to Yoshie's posts are only
> incidentally responses to the posts and most concerned with commenting
> on Yoshie personally. And vigorous expression ov views will provoke
> _some_ responses focusing on the person, but were Yoshie male the
> proportion of responses to subject & to person would undoubtedly be
> different.
How is pointing to Lerner as a concrete example of the kind of "progressive" religiosity Yoshie was touting a "personal" response? Were Yoshie a man you wouldn't see things this way.
Doug