--- Charles Brown <cbrown at michiganlegal.org> wrote:
>
> I don't know if that's the only motive, but it does
> seem to be an
> active influence. Quarantining people with AIDS
> would mean jailing
> lots of people who'd done absolutely nothing wrong
> but get sick. Most
> people with AIDS or HIV don't run around infecting
> other people. It
> would be enormously expensive - there are over a
> million Americans
> who are HIV+. The threat of quarantine would mean
> that no one would
> get tested or seek treatment, which would only make
> things worse.
> It's not like you ca catch AIDS from a sneeze,
> either.
>
> Doug
>
> ^^^^^
> CB; However , Cuba's quarantine method has resulted
> in an order of magnitude
> lower AIDS/HIV rates in Cuba compared to the U.S.
>
> You and Brian ignore that this probably means that
> Cuba saved many gay Cuban
> men's lives as compared with the U.S. What say you
> about this ?
>
> U.S. "freedom" = death for many,many gay men.
> Cuban quarantine = life for many Cuban gay men.
>
>
>
> When AIDS first came out, how could it be known with
> such certainty that it
> could not be transmitted casually ? If the
> scientists couldn't cure it , how
> could they be certain about limits for transmission
> ? If I were the Cubans,
> I wouldn't necessarily trust the U.S. first claims
> to know it couldn't be
> transmitted in other ways than sex , intravenous
> blood. From the Cuban
> standpoint , the U.S. might be using it as a
> biological weapon.
>
> ___________________________________
>
http://mailman.lbo-talk.org/mailman/listinfo/lbo-talk
>
__________________________________________________ Do You Yahoo!? Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around http://mail.yahoo.com