[lbo-talk] Re: Brokeback for gay men and small girls?

[info at pulpculture.org]

At 10:44 PM 2/1/2006, John Mage wrote:
>Kelley wrote:
>
> > At 08:31 PM 2/1/2006, Emily Gordon wrote:
> >
> >> So women and gay men? Open-minded people should get past the tired
> >> misogyny of "fag hags" and ask more questions.
> >
> > I'm sorry you are straight! I'm in lust!
> >
> > I was going to joke with Brian about the line in his forward that
> > said it was soft porn for women looking for men-on-men action.
> >
> > I like the HOT hard porn men-on-men action!
>
>Gimmeabreak. The moment at that movie that i tuned out for good - total
>end of suspension of disbelief, followed by being bored to tears
>watching great gobs of mediocre acting - was the sex scene. Unless the
>bottom had been the whore of babylon for the last decade or had been
>fisted by the bear all afternoon there is no way that he gets grabbed
>and a second later they're ecstatically assfucking. Look, like Justin
>when anyone talks academic philosophy, i assert authority about
>assfucking movies. Every movie i can recall having watched in the last
>year involved some assfucking (except Astra Taylor's "Zizek!") and by
>far the worst phoniest pathetically unbelievable so-called performance
>was Brokeback Mtn.
>
>john mage

I didn't say the film was about assfucking! I said I like that Hot hardcore 
featuring  two men! :)

I haven't seen brokeback. but i would assume from what i read it was tame. 
which was why i was going to joke with brian about my desire, not for soft 
core mano a mano, but harcore! :)

Bitch | Lab
http://blog.pulpculture.org