[lbo-talk] jeffrey stonecash takes issue with frank's "what's the matter with kansas?"

[Leigh Meyers]

ulisse mangialaio wrote:
> at http://www.bepress.com/forum/vol3/iss3/art4/
>
> i cannot access the full article (could anyone provide to the 
> commons?), but from the abstract one would argue that  stonecash 's 
> view doesn't differ from bartel's.
>

A guest account was easy.
It's Here: http://snipurl.com/mczq-lbotlk

Leigh
www.leighm.net
http://leighmdotnet.blogspot.com/