Interesting use of passive voice. "The 14th Amendment was undermined"-- no, the SUPREME COURT overturned democratically passed legislation to protect the rights of the freedmen, struck down the convictions of Klansmen, and prevented federal officials from arresting KKK terrorists throughout the South.
It was the Constitution that was used to destroy the democratic street heat coming out of the Civil War. Those standing up for civil rights had the votes in Congress to defend their rights; it was nine men in black robes who frustrated that democratic power and handed it over to the white hoods down south.
Why should judges act better than elected branches? What alchemy happens that makes them cherish rights more than democratically accountable leaders? "Locking in" the past into a constitution is far more likely to be a reactionary force restraining progressive change.
Nathan Newman