>Doug Henwood:
>
>> Fuck, I'm not against eminent domain for real public
> > improvement purposes,
>Further, I think it is important to maintain the principle that there is no
>such thing as absolute property right, and that private property rights are
>granted to fulfill public purposes. As I think you recognize in most other
>cases, opposition to eminent domain as such is regressive NIMBYism of the
>Louise Day Hicks school, and ought not be encouraged.
Uh, yeah, like I said.
Doug