I just took a poll of three people: all of them think that the civil rights movement started because black people got fed up with Jim Crow. Not definitive, but I think it's unlikely that anyone thinks that people in power make history and that no one has ever seen pictures of people protesting, particularly with the CR movement.
I don't think liberals are in the least bit interested in social movements or getting involved with them much at all. So, how it could damage anything -- I'm still unclear. For most USers, they buy the line that the SC should be "non-political" even they even think much of the SC at all. I don't think I read any of the liberal or dem blogs locally that think much about using the courts to change anything and would sooner think that they should work electorally or through letter writing campaigns, agitating politicians, maybe a little protest here or there.
As for Brown, well the NAACP started that strategy many years before and they did see it as part of what needed to be done. It was a long hard roe to hoe, but they had a strategy and they moved forward with it. And, it wasn't as if they didn't work in tandem with other events going on at the time.
What groups with whom we as lefties identify are going that way -- using the courts--as a way to achieve social change? REally, I thnk it's just NN imaginging that all the world is a bunch of attorneys like him. And using it as a trope to hammer on something else. What that is, I'm unclear. I have my uncharitable suspicions though.
I suspect that, the typically educated person doesn't think that things happened the way you describe.
Bitch | Lab http://blog.pulpculture.org