>
> ferguson's book was almost completely ignored by poli sci folks, most
> certainly the mainstream garden variety...
>
> thesis shouldn't be disagreeable to most lbo-sters, elite abiliity to
> dominate policy outcomes through "control" of/influence over the
> electoral process...
>
> essentially a rational choice argument: candidates for office must
> seek favor from some portion of the corporate sector...
>
For what it's worth, Ferguson and Rogers's _Right Turn: The Decline of the Democrats and the Future of American Politics_, published in 1986, has a different spin on this thesis. They portray a Democratic party that turned rightward in the late 1970s ahead of any rightward movement by the electorate. Perhaps they overplay the investment theory of politics a bit much. But it is clear from the last 30 years or so that the American right wing believes in this theory and practices it often.
(_Right Turn_ got assigned in at least one big political science grad program in the early 1990s as a contrarian view to the idea that the 1980s contained a political realignment amongst the electorate.)
--tim f-w