On Jun 5, 2006, at 11:00 AM, Carl Remick wrote:
> [A couple of items here about Peter Beinart, champion of a
> resurgent liberalism that recognizes the evil of the new
> totalitarianism emanating from radical Islam, which requires
> liberals to take all actions necessary to combat this evil "even
> when their moral purity is compromised in the effort." Beinart is
> an excellent example of what irredeemable assholes liberals are,
> and he is a timely reminder that liberalism remains perhaps the
> greatest lasting threat to peace and democratic values the world
> has known.]
I'm confused. If Beinart says that liberals have lost the world because of their intense squishiness, how is liberalism the prime threat? Isn't Beinartism a greater threat?
Doug