On Jun 7, 2006, at 1:18 PM, hirsch wrote:
> I always thought "Dog" was the accepted male equivalent for "slut."
> Yes, it
> doesn't have the sting of opprobrium as does "slut," but it's hardly
> complementary.
or 'womanizer'... implying a predatory slut, one who victimizes helpless women.. is it worse to be a victimizer or helpless or the perception of helplessness? pick an interpretation it doesn't matter. it's alot of confirmation bias. better to stick to real oppression... that actually exists outside of some narrow selective perception.
~J