At 07:21 PM 6/7/2006, J wrote:
>On Jun 7, 2006, at 1:18 PM, hirsch wrote:
>
>>I always thought "Dog" was the accepted male equivalent for "slut." Yes, it
>>doesn't have the sting of opprobrium as does "slut," but it's hardly
>>complementary.
>
>or 'womanizer'... implying a predatory slut, one who victimizes helpless
>women.. is it worse to be a victimizer or helpless or the perception of
>helplessness? pick an interpretation it doesn't matter. it's alot of
>confirmation bias. better to stick to real oppression... that actually
>exists outside of some narrow selective perception.
>
>~J
Bitch | Lab http://blog.pulpculture.org