I though Dolan's dissertation was on Sade?
Great Gods of Literacy, the guy meant that she had pandered her way to success, and that she had basically done Lawrence 70 years later.
I didn't even so that I endorsed the piece -- though I do think Roy is a panderer and deliberate distorter of facts.
By the way, talking about "male resentment" of success is an utterly lame variant of the "your just jealous of Frey!" complaint.
I have half a mind to write Dolan and ask him about this.
--- info at pulpculture.org wrote:
> At 09:06 AM 3/6/2006, Yoshie Furuhashi wrote:
>
> >The lowest point comes when Dolan says that Roy
> "fucked her way to
> >fame." There is no need to post sexism of this
> sort here, let alone
> >TWICE. (I suppose neither you nor B. recognized it
> as an instance of
> >sexism.)
> >
> >If you are dying to post a criticism of Roy, post
> the one that is
> >informative, not a sexist raving like this.
>
>
> Thanks for doing the homework Yoshie. Somehow, I
> missed the "fucked her way
> to fame" line when I read Dolan's article. And, I'm
> glad you said something
> about the content of the book since Dolan did say
> she was a plagiarist.
>
> As a student of rhetoric, you have to wonder how
> much of that talent has
> been put to use for the purposes of doing precisely
> what his dissertation
> focused on: manipulation.
>
>
>
>
>
>
> Bitch | Lab
> http://blog.pulpculture.org
>
> ___________________________________
>
http://mailman.lbo-talk.org/mailman/listinfo/lbo-talk
>
Nu, zayats, pogodi!
__________________________________________________ Do You Yahoo!? Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around http://mail.yahoo.com