--- uvj at vsnl.com wrote:
> Chris Doss wrote:
>
> > Anyway, getting bin Laden on trial wouldn't have
> done
> > anthing to the jihadi infrastructure.
>
> Yes. Moreover, there was (& there is still) a danger
> of creeping talibanisation of Pakistani state and
> society: A state armed with nuclear weapons and
> missiles, aircrafts & ships to deliver them.
>
> Ulhas
>
>
> > --- uvj at vsnl.com wrote:
> >
> > > Andy F wrote:
> > >
> > > > A variant of which the Taliban supposedly
> offered
> > > -- giving up ObL on
> > > > the onerous condition that he be tried in a
> third
> > > country.
> > > >
> > > > Since this would have resembled police work
> (as
> > > opposed to a good
> > > > stiffdicked war), their sincerity was never
> > > tested.
> > >
> > > Taliban government was recognised by three
> states,
> > > Pakistan, Saudi Arabia and UAE. Which third
> country
> > > could have tried Osama bin Laden?
> > >
>
>
> ___________________________________
>
http://mailman.lbo-talk.org/mailman/listinfo/lbo-talk
>
Nu, zayats, pogodi!
__________________________________________________ Do You Yahoo!? Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around http://mail.yahoo.com