[lbo-talk] HUAC comes to Pacifica Radio Again

Joseph Wanzala jwanzala at hotmail.com
Tue Mar 14 10:56:24 PST 2006


Okay, I apologize for misinterpreting your post. I agree that getting involved with Pacifica governance is a daunting proposition at best and my initial reaction perhaps partly due to being too accustomed to being in combat mode. I do think - despite our differences on almost everything - that voices such as yours are important to what Pacifica is about. I hope you continue staying involved in your own way.

Joe W.


>From: Doug Henwood <dhenwood at panix.com>
>Reply-To: lbo-talk at lbo-talk.org
>To: lbo-talk at lbo-talk.org
>Subject: RE: [lbo-talk] HUAC comes to Pacifica Radio Again
>Date: Tue, 14 Mar 2006 13:28:36 -0500
>
>Joseph Wanzala wrote:
>
>>Hey Doug, I see you are as smug as usual about this which is too bad. One
>>might be excused for thinking you have no connection the network. Why
>>bother? So we can continue to hear shows such as yours no? - don't you
>>care about your own program at least?
>
>Obviously I didn't make myself clear. Actually I care about this more than
>ever, and have been agitating among some of my fellow producers about doing
>something. (An awful lot of them are just shrugging, in a gesture of
>hopelessness.) The "why bother?" came from near-despair, not smugness.
>Maybe I'm overly affected by the mess that is WBAI, but getting involved
>with Pacifica governance seems like exposing yourself to massive amounts of
>flying shrapnel with only a very remote chance of success. Describing it as
>an uphill battle feels like an understatement.
>
>Doug
>___________________________________
>http://mailman.lbo-talk.org/mailman/listinfo/lbo-talk



More information about the lbo-talk mailing list