[lbo-talk] HUAC comes to Pacifica Radio Again

[Joseph Wanzala]

Okay, I apologize for misinterpreting your post. I agree that getting 
involved with Pacifica governance is a daunting proposition at best and my 
initial reaction perhaps partly due to being too accustomed to being in 
combat mode. I do think - despite our differences on almost everything - 
that voices such as yours are important to what Pacifica is about. I hope 
you continue staying involved in your own way.

Joe W.


>From: Doug Henwood <dhenwood at panix.com>
>Reply-To: lbo-talk at lbo-talk.org
>To: lbo-talk at lbo-talk.org
>Subject: RE: [lbo-talk] HUAC comes to Pacifica Radio Again
>Date: Tue, 14 Mar 2006 13:28:36 -0500
>
>Joseph Wanzala wrote:
>
>>Hey Doug, I see you are as smug as usual about this which is too bad. One 
>>might be excused for thinking you have no connection the network. Why 
>>bother? So we can continue to hear shows such as yours no? - don't you 
>>care about your own program at least?
>
>Obviously I didn't make myself clear. Actually I care about this more than 
>ever, and have been agitating among some of my fellow producers about doing 
>something. (An awful lot of them are just shrugging, in a gesture of 
>hopelessness.) The "why bother?" came from near-despair, not smugness. 
>Maybe I'm overly affected by the mess that is WBAI, but getting involved 
>with Pacifica governance seems like exposing yourself to massive amounts of 
>flying shrapnel with only a very remote chance of success. Describing it as 
>an uphill battle feels like an understatement.
>
>Doug
>___________________________________
>http://mailman.lbo-talk.org/mailman/listinfo/lbo-talk