[lbo-talk] Fight the taboo on the use of the word "racist"
Miles Jackson
cqmv at pdx.edu
Tue Mar 14 18:30:24 PST 2006
jthorn65 at sbcglobal.net wrote:
> On 14 Mar 2006 at 14:48, Jim Devine wrote:
>
>>I think Doug's formulation is better. The problem with the word
>>"racism" is not that it's been over-used as much as it's been
>>mis-used. For example, I've seen advocates of the W.J. Wilson
>>"declining significance of race" theory being described as "racist"
>>even though Wilson doesn't deny the existence of institutional racism.
>
>
> This just poses up another question. Why are some people mis-using the term? Where do they get their
> definition of racism? What is their definition of racism?
>
Like almost everything in a hyperindividualist society, it must be
construed and described as a psychological trait. Think Maggie's
"there's no such thing as society, only individual men and women".
Remapping all social phenomena as individual traits is a crucial
ideological bulwark for capitalism; thus the ubiquity of the
"racism-as-psychological-aberration" silliness.
Miles
More information about the lbo-talk
mailing list